Maitake bread and upper-respiratory symptoms
Tested intervention
Bread providing the equivalent of 50 g fresh Grifola frondosa daily, prepared separately from strain Y10M or strain C5304; matched placebo bread. This was not a purified polysaccharide or solvent extract.
In this peer-reviewed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy adults aged 18–20 or 40–85 consumed the bread for 11 or 18 weeks, respectively. Approximately 165 participants were analysed across three groups.
The clinically important result was null: neither strain reduced the overall incidence of upper-respiratory-tract infection episodes. Secondary analyses associated Y10M—but not consistently C5304—with fewer days of fever and runny nose in both age cohorts, and fewer sore-throat days among younger participants. Y10M also altered several immune-cell and interferon-related measurements in older participants.
The design was comparatively strong, but confidence is limited by numerous symptom, subgroup and biomarker comparisons; self-reported illness; differing follow-up periods; and lack of virological confirmation. Moreover, the trial registry named complete blood count as its primary outcome, whereas the paper foregrounds respiratory symptoms and immunity. That mismatch raises outcome-selection concerns. The manufacturer funded the study and company-affiliated researchers were among the authors.
This is not evidence that “maitake prevents colds.” At most, it is a strain-specific secondary signal following a null overall infection result. The peer-reviewed study was published 21 September 2026.
Manuscript verdict
Change now. Add one restrained sentence recording the null primary clinical result, the exploratory Y10M symptom signals, C5304’s limited effects and the need for independent replication. Do not upgrade maitake’s clinical evidence grade.
Source: Peer-reviewed study and trial registration